The Surprising Truth Behind Charity Rankings

Who’s choosing the Top 10

Why It Matters

In theory, charity rankings hold organizations accountable, and can help donors identify which organizations are having the greatest impact — especially helpful information during times of crisis or hardship. But what kind of criteria are these rankings using — and what are the unintended consequences?

var TRINITY_TTS_WP_CONFIG = {"cleanText":"The Surprising Truth Behind Charity Rankings. Charity Intelligence released its Top 10 List of Impactful Charities in November 2019, following Maclean\u2019s list the month prior of 100 Best Charities in Canada. The latter sparked criticism amongst social impact sector leaders who vocalized their concern with the ranking criteria.\u00a0 These lists, produced annually by publications like The Globe and Mail, The Nonprofit Times, Moneysense, and Givewelln generate a fair bit of buzz. In addition, websites like Charity Navigator and GuideStar rate charities and have been criticized for placing too much emphasis on financial reporting.\u00a0 \u201cThe idea of our best charities being measured by how little they\u2019re spending is a concerning trend,\u20

Future of Good journalism and events produce insightful analysis and knowledge you need to work and grow.

Read this article with a free account or explore membership options for unlimited access.