Disaggregated data can reveal systemic inequities. It can also reinforce them — here’s how.

Experts say disaggregated data collection needs to be done with the consent and guidance of subjects, as well as a genuine commitment to change.

Why It Matters

Community trust in social impact organizations who do disaggregated data collection can be shattered if it is done badly, especially with subjects who are already overpoliced and surveilled.

Toronto Public Health’s (TPH) decision to collect race, ethnicity, income, and housing data from COVID-19 patients to track the virus’s spread goes all the way back to the first few months of the pandemic. 

The results are unsurprising to anyone with the most basic understanding of structural racism. Around 73 percent of all COVID cases in Toronto, and 74 percent of those admitted to hospital for treatment, are among racialized people. Some of the city’s poorest neighbourhoods are among the most ethnically diverse and have the highest COVID-19 case and fatality rates. 

Yet Toronto Public Health’s decision to collect disaggregated race-based health data was not universally applauded. In June 2020, after TPH published a neighbourhood level COVID map, the Black Public Health Collective condemned the practice in a statement. They pointed out that Black communities

Our social impact coverage and insights enrich thousands of change makers like you everyday. Sign up for a free account with Future of Good to continue reading this series.